I’ve always wondered about the answer to this question, but I’ve never been able to come up with one. After reading this essay I’ve found that there is no real answer. It’s subjective. But for argument’s sake I’m going to give one answer to this.
The definition of ethical is “pertaining to or dealing with morals” (dictionary.com), that being said I do not think killing any living thing is moral. Therefore, hunting is not ethical. That does not mean it should never be practiced, however. I do not advocate hunting nor do I reject it. It is both grotesque and useful.
There are several valid arguments for hunting. One being that we aren’t letting an ancient practice die out. If there were to be some sort of apocalypse in the near future and you needed to hunt to survive we would know how to. Then there’s the argument that the primitiveness of it is its appeal. In the essay it states that this is “the most uncivilized and primitive activity in which a modern person can legally engage”. “It allows an individual to participate directly in the life and death on which all natural systems depend”. There are going to be those people who just want to kill something and as atrocious as it sounds, I’d much rather that be an animal than a human. You have to ask yourself what level of importance do you place upon animals, are they equal to humans? For me that’s a no, so killing them is not as bad as killing a person. If it allows someone to get out there aggressions so be it. I do not condone it though.
There are also several arguments against hunting. In this society we don’t need to hunt to get food. We can simply go to the market and pick up what we need. Then there is the matter of the irreverence with which people hunt. It doesn’t matter if you are effectively monitoring the game population. You are only looking at the species as a whole not each creature’s individual life. The Native Americans, when they were forced to make a kill, took a moment after every kill to recognize the animals sacrifice and to honor and respect it. Perhaps if it were more like this I’d be happier. Instead most hunters see them as trophies or a conquest. Just something to shoot. That brings me to hunting for sport, which is utterly unacceptable in my eyes. Sure I see the appeal but I do not like it. You are essentially taking pleasure in the death of another living breathing thing. They have lives, too. You could be killing a mother’s baby or a baby’s mother. You could be sentencing “to slow death the orphaned offspring of their legally killed lactating mothers”.
I cannot say that I agree with the author because she does not choose a side. As she points out, morality is in the eye of the beholder. So there cannot be a definitive answer. But I can say I do not like the idea of killing another innocent creature so I view it as immoral, which by definition makes it unethical.